Models of Nominating the Mining Objects of the Ural Gold and Rock Crystal Deposits in the Comparative Aspect

This article discusses the names of mining objects gold and rock crystal located in Southern, Middle, Circumpolar Urals. These include mines, placers, veins, other artificial on territory deposits associated with extraction these minerals. The purpose study is to identify main models object nomination compare specific cases using depending characteristics extracted raw materials, methods their development geographical location deposit. author analyses a total 627 names. refers specialised works history mining, crystal, deposits. There are three nomination: anthroponymic, toponymic (according origin toponym) object-motivated situation). In different fields, presented proportions implementations. Thus, anthroponymic model becomes leading one for Beryozovsky deposit, Ural units represented at each deposits, quantitatively significantly inferior given based models. It concluded that characteristic emergence particular nature its (private prospector / regular state), as well number subject naming. economic deposit prior start it also plays role. At same time, mineral does not matter significantly.